Skip to main content
Check and provide your planning data

BETA This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

Back to dataset table
East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

1390

reference
921-tree-1
name
1390
tree-preservation-order

undefined

921-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-1.025787 50.868100)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-1.025688 50.868090,-1.025693 50.868109,-1.025706 50.868127,-1.025728 50.868141,-1.025756 50.868150,-1.025786 50.868153,-1.025817 50.868151,-1.025845 50.868142,-1.025867 50.868128,-1.025882 50.868111,-1.025887 50.868091,-1.025883 50.868072,-1.025869 50.868054,-1.025847 50.868040,-1.025820 50.868031,-1.025789 50.868028,-1.025758 50.868030,-1.025730 50.868039,-1.025708 50.868053,-1.025693 50.868070,-1.025688 50.868090)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL